Line Chart with a "Single Category Group"

Hi Folks
I have a line chart showing some data vs time. The chart is okay when
we have multiple periods (say Q1 2006 and Q2 2006). However, the chart
is empty when only period (the category group) is being displayed.
This leaves me with two questions...,
1. is this because line charts are supposed to show trends over
multiple category groups and thus are Not applicable for a single
category group?
2. is there a fix for this?
Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
Thnx a ton.Oops..., I meant the chart is empty when only a single period (say only
Q1 2006) is selected (i.e. is to be displayed).
> I have a line chart showing some data vs time. The chart is okay when
> we have multiple periods (say Q1 2006 and Q2 2006). However, the chart
> is empty when only period (the category group) is being displayed.|||Allright, the problem has been solved :D
Turns out I need to edit the data field, and enable the "Show Markers"
checkbox :)
Profundus wrote:
> Hi Folks
> I have a line chart showing some data vs time. The chart is okay when
> we have multiple periods (say Q1 2006 and Q2 2006). However, the chart
> is empty when only period (the category group) is being displayed.
> This leaves me with two questions...,
> 1. is this because line charts are supposed to show trends over
> multiple category groups and thus are Not applicable for a single
> category group?
> 2. is there a fix for this?
> Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
> Thnx a ton.

LIMITs on MIRROR with SQL Server SE

Hi folks. I'm trying to clear up some licensing confusion I"ve come across. First, if I use MIRROR on SS SE I am limited to a single REDO thread and Sycn mode. I see that on the Web. Will the singel REDO thread hurt the ability for the Secondary to keep up? Any one done any tests?

My confusion comes from a document that came across my desk a long time ago that showed that if you use MIRROR on SQL Server SE you are limited to 4 processors for the entire cluster. So if you wanted a balanced failover you would have to have two 2-ways in essence. Is this true? Is it not longer true? I can't seem to find any mention of this....did someone give me bad advice? Help! Thanks.

Licensing will not hurt any performance, only the number of transactions will have the recovery of REDO and UNDO process during the recovery.

|||In standard edition you wont get parallel redo and database snapshots features in the case of database mirroring.