Hello,
I am getting an error in my .NET app and the error comes from a SQL
Server sproc. I am able to capture the line number. My question is how
to find that line? Do I start counting from CREATE PROCEDURE or from
the AS statement? Or elsewhere?
Frank,
Execute the sproc in Query Analyzer. When the error message appears in the
result pane, double-click it - should highlight the line or general location
of the error.
HTH
Jerry
"Frank Rizzo" <none@.none.com> wrote in message
news:O5ChPem1FHA.3188@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Hello,
> I am getting an error in my .NET app and the error comes from a SQL Server
> sproc. I am able to capture the line number. My question is how to find
> that line? Do I start counting from CREATE PROCEDURE or from the AS
> statement? Or elsewhere?
>
|||Jerry Spivey wrote:
>Frank,
>Execute the sproc in Query Analyzer. When the error message appears in the
>result pane, double-click it - should highlight the line or general location
>of the error.
>
Unfortunately, this is not something that happens all the time. It
happens very rarely. When it does happen, the application captures and
writes out to a log all the info it can. This is where the line number
is found as well. Thus I am trying to troubleshoot a sproc based on a
line number.
So, that said, do I start counting from CREATE PROCEDURE or from the AS
statement?
>HTH
>Jerry
>"Frank Rizzo" <none@.none.com> wrote in message
>news:O5ChPem1FHA.3188@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>
>
>
Showing posts with label sqlserver. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sqlserver. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Line Number
Hello,
I am getting an error in my .NET app and the error comes from a SQL
Server sproc. I am able to capture the line number. My question is how
to find that line? Do I start counting from CREATE PROCEDURE or from
the AS statement? Or elsewhere?Frank,
Execute the sproc in Query Analyzer. When the error message appears in the
result pane, double-click it - should highlight the line or general location
of the error.
HTH
Jerry
"Frank Rizzo" <none@.none.com> wrote in message
news:O5ChPem1FHA.3188@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Hello,
> I am getting an error in my .NET app and the error comes from a SQL Server
> sproc. I am able to capture the line number. My question is how to find
> that line? Do I start counting from CREATE PROCEDURE or from the AS
> statement? Or elsewhere?
>|||Jerry Spivey wrote:
>Frank,
>Execute the sproc in Query Analyzer. When the error message appears in the
>result pane, double-click it - should highlight the line or general locatio
n
>of the error.
>
Unfortunately, this is not something that happens all the time. It
happens very rarely. When it does happen, the application captures and
writes out to a log all the info it can. This is where the line number
is found as well. Thus I am trying to troubleshoot a sproc based on a
line number.
So, that said, do I start counting from CREATE PROCEDURE or from the AS
statement?
>HTH
>Jerry
>"Frank Rizzo" <none@.none.com> wrote in message
>news:O5ChPem1FHA.3188@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>
>
>
I am getting an error in my .NET app and the error comes from a SQL
Server sproc. I am able to capture the line number. My question is how
to find that line? Do I start counting from CREATE PROCEDURE or from
the AS statement? Or elsewhere?Frank,
Execute the sproc in Query Analyzer. When the error message appears in the
result pane, double-click it - should highlight the line or general location
of the error.
HTH
Jerry
"Frank Rizzo" <none@.none.com> wrote in message
news:O5ChPem1FHA.3188@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Hello,
> I am getting an error in my .NET app and the error comes from a SQL Server
> sproc. I am able to capture the line number. My question is how to find
> that line? Do I start counting from CREATE PROCEDURE or from the AS
> statement? Or elsewhere?
>|||Jerry Spivey wrote:
>Frank,
>Execute the sproc in Query Analyzer. When the error message appears in the
>result pane, double-click it - should highlight the line or general locatio
n
>of the error.
>
Unfortunately, this is not something that happens all the time. It
happens very rarely. When it does happen, the application captures and
writes out to a log all the info it can. This is where the line number
is found as well. Thus I am trying to troubleshoot a sproc based on a
line number.
So, that said, do I start counting from CREATE PROCEDURE or from the AS
statement?
>HTH
>Jerry
>"Frank Rizzo" <none@.none.com> wrote in message
>news:O5ChPem1FHA.3188@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>
>
>
Monday, March 19, 2012
Limits SQLServer Express
Hi, can someone explain which are the limits o maximum values that SQLServer Express permit?
I dont see anywhere a compare table in which it says, 10 concurrent connections, etc.
Thanks in advance.
The only limitations that apply are shown here: http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/features/compare-features.mspx
There is no longer a workload governor.
HTH, Jens Suessmeyer.
http://www.sqlserver2005.de
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Limitations of SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition
Can someone tell me what the record limit is or db size is for PE of SQL
Server 2000. I'm trying to import 33.6 million records, and I keep getting
an error message that says the data contains an extra column at 454K records
.
I've tried the HELP, but I only see the Terrabyte limits. Is PE less than
than. The db is set to automatically grow.
TIA
MarkYour error message isn't related to capacity. The system is telling you
that there is an extra column in a record. SQL requires a fixed number of
columns inan import source file. Most likely you are using a comma or tab
delimited file. Inside that file there is a character string that has an
extra delimiter character so SQL interprets that as an extra column. This
is fairly common on a data import from a non-scrubbed source.
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"MChrist" <MChrist@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:41821F63-5257-411B-9C8F-19E0CC3E6FF2@.microsoft.com...
> Can someone tell me what the record limit is or db size is for PE of SQL
> Server 2000. I'm trying to import 33.6 million records, and I keep
> getting
> an error message that says the data contains an extra column at 454K
> records.
> I've tried the HELP, but I only see the Terrabyte limits. Is PE less than
> than. The db is set to automatically grow.
> TIA
> Mark|||Hello Geoff,
Thanks for taking the time to answer my post. I realized the message it
probably correct, although I suspect it's an error because I loaded similar
files to the server at my office, and now when I'm trying to load them on my
PC at home, I'm running into this problem.
It could be a problem in the tab delimited file as you say, but I've tried 2
of the 3 text files, and I get the same error message at record 454,157.
Since these text files aren't the exact same files as I loaded at work, it's
possible that there is a cliche in my PC creating slightly different version
s
of the files than my work PC, but not likely to generate the error at the
same point within the file.
Do you know though if there are limitations on the size of the db on the PE
version?
TIA
Mark
"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> Your error message isn't related to capacity. The system is telling you
> that there is an extra column in a record. SQL requires a fixed number of
> columns inan import source file. Most likely you are using a comma or tab
> delimited file. Inside that file there is a character string that has an
> extra delimiter character so SQL interprets that as an extra column. This
> is fairly common on a data import from a non-scrubbed source.
> --
> Geoff N. Hiten
> Senior Database Administrator
> Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> "MChrist" <MChrist@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:41821F63-5257-411B-9C8F-19E0CC3E6FF2@.microsoft.com...
>
>|||There are memory and processor usage limitations, but no database size
limitations in PE. Lok up "Maximum Capacity Limitations" in BOL. Also,
pre-expand your SQL Data files to hold the entire import. Auto-grow can
sometimes cause timeout issues.
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"MChrist" <MChrist@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6FA717DB-6D9D-4480-ADE8-4B64C9DB5DC6@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hello Geoff,
> Thanks for taking the time to answer my post. I realized the message it
> probably correct, although I suspect it's an error because I loaded
> similar
> files to the server at my office, and now when I'm trying to load them on
> my
> PC at home, I'm running into this problem.
> It could be a problem in the tab delimited file as you say, but I've tried
> 2
> of the 3 text files, and I get the same error message at record 454,157.
> Since these text files aren't the exact same files as I loaded at work,
> it's
> possible that there is a cliche in my PC creating slightly different
> versions
> of the files than my work PC, but not likely to generate the error at the
> same point within the file.
> Do you know though if there are limitations on the size of the db on the
> PE
> version?
> TIA
> Mark
> "Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
>
Server 2000. I'm trying to import 33.6 million records, and I keep getting
an error message that says the data contains an extra column at 454K records
.
I've tried the HELP, but I only see the Terrabyte limits. Is PE less than
than. The db is set to automatically grow.
TIA
MarkYour error message isn't related to capacity. The system is telling you
that there is an extra column in a record. SQL requires a fixed number of
columns inan import source file. Most likely you are using a comma or tab
delimited file. Inside that file there is a character string that has an
extra delimiter character so SQL interprets that as an extra column. This
is fairly common on a data import from a non-scrubbed source.
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"MChrist" <MChrist@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:41821F63-5257-411B-9C8F-19E0CC3E6FF2@.microsoft.com...
> Can someone tell me what the record limit is or db size is for PE of SQL
> Server 2000. I'm trying to import 33.6 million records, and I keep
> getting
> an error message that says the data contains an extra column at 454K
> records.
> I've tried the HELP, but I only see the Terrabyte limits. Is PE less than
> than. The db is set to automatically grow.
> TIA
> Mark|||Hello Geoff,
Thanks for taking the time to answer my post. I realized the message it
probably correct, although I suspect it's an error because I loaded similar
files to the server at my office, and now when I'm trying to load them on my
PC at home, I'm running into this problem.
It could be a problem in the tab delimited file as you say, but I've tried 2
of the 3 text files, and I get the same error message at record 454,157.
Since these text files aren't the exact same files as I loaded at work, it's
possible that there is a cliche in my PC creating slightly different version
s
of the files than my work PC, but not likely to generate the error at the
same point within the file.
Do you know though if there are limitations on the size of the db on the PE
version?
TIA
Mark
"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> Your error message isn't related to capacity. The system is telling you
> that there is an extra column in a record. SQL requires a fixed number of
> columns inan import source file. Most likely you are using a comma or tab
> delimited file. Inside that file there is a character string that has an
> extra delimiter character so SQL interprets that as an extra column. This
> is fairly common on a data import from a non-scrubbed source.
> --
> Geoff N. Hiten
> Senior Database Administrator
> Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> "MChrist" <MChrist@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:41821F63-5257-411B-9C8F-19E0CC3E6FF2@.microsoft.com...
>
>|||There are memory and processor usage limitations, but no database size
limitations in PE. Lok up "Maximum Capacity Limitations" in BOL. Also,
pre-expand your SQL Data files to hold the entire import. Auto-grow can
sometimes cause timeout issues.
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"MChrist" <MChrist@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6FA717DB-6D9D-4480-ADE8-4B64C9DB5DC6@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hello Geoff,
> Thanks for taking the time to answer my post. I realized the message it
> probably correct, although I suspect it's an error because I loaded
> similar
> files to the server at my office, and now when I'm trying to load them on
> my
> PC at home, I'm running into this problem.
> It could be a problem in the tab delimited file as you say, but I've tried
> 2
> of the 3 text files, and I get the same error message at record 454,157.
> Since these text files aren't the exact same files as I loaded at work,
> it's
> possible that there is a cliche in my PC creating slightly different
> versions
> of the files than my work PC, but not likely to generate the error at the
> same point within the file.
> Do you know though if there are limitations on the size of the db on the
> PE
> version?
> TIA
> Mark
> "Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
>
Limitations of SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition
Can someone tell me what the record limit is or db size is for PE of SQL
Server 2000. I'm trying to import 33.6 million records, and I keep getting
an error message that says the data contains an extra column at 454K records.
I've tried the HELP, but I only see the Terrabyte limits. Is PE less than
than. The db is set to automatically grow.
TIA
Mark
Your error message isn't related to capacity. The system is telling you
that there is an extra column in a record. SQL requires a fixed number of
columns inan import source file. Most likely you are using a comma or tab
delimited file. Inside that file there is a character string that has an
extra delimiter character so SQL interprets that as an extra column. This
is fairly common on a data import from a non-scrubbed source.
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"MChrist" <MChrist@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:41821F63-5257-411B-9C8F-19E0CC3E6FF2@.microsoft.com...
> Can someone tell me what the record limit is or db size is for PE of SQL
> Server 2000. I'm trying to import 33.6 million records, and I keep
> getting
> an error message that says the data contains an extra column at 454K
> records.
> I've tried the HELP, but I only see the Terrabyte limits. Is PE less than
> than. The db is set to automatically grow.
> TIA
> Mark
|||Hello Geoff,
Thanks for taking the time to answer my post. I realized the message it
probably correct, although I suspect it's an error because I loaded similar
files to the server at my office, and now when I'm trying to load them on my
PC at home, I'm running into this problem.
It could be a problem in the tab delimited file as you say, but I've tried 2
of the 3 text files, and I get the same error message at record 454,157.
Since these text files aren't the exact same files as I loaded at work, it's
possible that there is a cliche in my PC creating slightly different versions
of the files than my work PC, but not likely to generate the error at the
same point within the file.
Do you know though if there are limitations on the size of the db on the PE
version?
TIA
Mark
"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> Your error message isn't related to capacity. The system is telling you
> that there is an extra column in a record. SQL requires a fixed number of
> columns inan import source file. Most likely you are using a comma or tab
> delimited file. Inside that file there is a character string that has an
> extra delimiter character so SQL interprets that as an extra column. This
> is fairly common on a data import from a non-scrubbed source.
> --
> Geoff N. Hiten
> Senior Database Administrator
> Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> "MChrist" <MChrist@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:41821F63-5257-411B-9C8F-19E0CC3E6FF2@.microsoft.com...
>
>
|||There are memory and processor usage limitations, but no database size
limitations in PE. Lok up "Maximum Capacity Limitations" in BOL. Also,
pre-expand your SQL Data files to hold the entire import. Auto-grow can
sometimes cause timeout issues.
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"MChrist" <MChrist@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6FA717DB-6D9D-4480-ADE8-4B64C9DB5DC6@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hello Geoff,
> Thanks for taking the time to answer my post. I realized the message it
> probably correct, although I suspect it's an error because I loaded
> similar
> files to the server at my office, and now when I'm trying to load them on
> my
> PC at home, I'm running into this problem.
> It could be a problem in the tab delimited file as you say, but I've tried
> 2
> of the 3 text files, and I get the same error message at record 454,157.
> Since these text files aren't the exact same files as I loaded at work,
> it's
> possible that there is a cliche in my PC creating slightly different
> versions
> of the files than my work PC, but not likely to generate the error at the
> same point within the file.
> Do you know though if there are limitations on the size of the db on the
> PE
> version?
> TIA
> Mark
> "Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
Server 2000. I'm trying to import 33.6 million records, and I keep getting
an error message that says the data contains an extra column at 454K records.
I've tried the HELP, but I only see the Terrabyte limits. Is PE less than
than. The db is set to automatically grow.
TIA
Mark
Your error message isn't related to capacity. The system is telling you
that there is an extra column in a record. SQL requires a fixed number of
columns inan import source file. Most likely you are using a comma or tab
delimited file. Inside that file there is a character string that has an
extra delimiter character so SQL interprets that as an extra column. This
is fairly common on a data import from a non-scrubbed source.
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"MChrist" <MChrist@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:41821F63-5257-411B-9C8F-19E0CC3E6FF2@.microsoft.com...
> Can someone tell me what the record limit is or db size is for PE of SQL
> Server 2000. I'm trying to import 33.6 million records, and I keep
> getting
> an error message that says the data contains an extra column at 454K
> records.
> I've tried the HELP, but I only see the Terrabyte limits. Is PE less than
> than. The db is set to automatically grow.
> TIA
> Mark
|||Hello Geoff,
Thanks for taking the time to answer my post. I realized the message it
probably correct, although I suspect it's an error because I loaded similar
files to the server at my office, and now when I'm trying to load them on my
PC at home, I'm running into this problem.
It could be a problem in the tab delimited file as you say, but I've tried 2
of the 3 text files, and I get the same error message at record 454,157.
Since these text files aren't the exact same files as I loaded at work, it's
possible that there is a cliche in my PC creating slightly different versions
of the files than my work PC, but not likely to generate the error at the
same point within the file.
Do you know though if there are limitations on the size of the db on the PE
version?
TIA
Mark
"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> Your error message isn't related to capacity. The system is telling you
> that there is an extra column in a record. SQL requires a fixed number of
> columns inan import source file. Most likely you are using a comma or tab
> delimited file. Inside that file there is a character string that has an
> extra delimiter character so SQL interprets that as an extra column. This
> is fairly common on a data import from a non-scrubbed source.
> --
> Geoff N. Hiten
> Senior Database Administrator
> Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> "MChrist" <MChrist@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:41821F63-5257-411B-9C8F-19E0CC3E6FF2@.microsoft.com...
>
>
|||There are memory and processor usage limitations, but no database size
limitations in PE. Lok up "Maximum Capacity Limitations" in BOL. Also,
pre-expand your SQL Data files to hold the entire import. Auto-grow can
sometimes cause timeout issues.
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"MChrist" <MChrist@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6FA717DB-6D9D-4480-ADE8-4B64C9DB5DC6@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hello Geoff,
> Thanks for taking the time to answer my post. I realized the message it
> probably correct, although I suspect it's an error because I loaded
> similar
> files to the server at my office, and now when I'm trying to load them on
> my
> PC at home, I'm running into this problem.
> It could be a problem in the tab delimited file as you say, but I've tried
> 2
> of the 3 text files, and I get the same error message at record 454,157.
> Since these text files aren't the exact same files as I loaded at work,
> it's
> possible that there is a cliche in my PC creating slightly different
> versions
> of the files than my work PC, but not likely to generate the error at the
> same point within the file.
> Do you know though if there are limitations on the size of the db on the
> PE
> version?
> TIA
> Mark
> "Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
Limitations in SQL Server 2005 Express
Is there any information on any limits in the facilities available in SQL
Server 2005 Express (compared with Standard edition)?
For example: database size, maximum number of users etc.
What features are not available in the Express edition?
Thanks,
Steve.There is a 4GB limit for database size in SQL Server Express. As far as
number of users I do not think there is any limitation. Here is the complete
feature comparison chart for the different editions:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodin...e-features.mspx
HTH,
Plamen Ratchev
http://www.SQLStudio.com|||Hello,
Only advantage in SQL Express over SQL 2005 Standard edition is it is FREE
OF COST. SQL Express have below limitations:-
1. Maximum 4 GB database size
2. Allow only 1 GB RAM
3.Allow only 1 CPU
4. No Profiler
5. No SQL Agent to schedule jobs
The list goes on and on...
Thanks
Hari
"Sawlmgsj" <Sawlmgsj@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:948DDF45-3E76-4146-8610-3471873770C1@.microsoft.com...
> Is there any information on any limits in the facilities available in SQL
> Server 2005 Express (compared with Standard edition)?
> For example: database size, maximum number of users etc.
> What features are not available in the Express edition?
> Thanks,
> Steve.
>|||Many thanks for your comments and the link to Ms.
Steve.
"Hari Prasad" wrote:
> Hello,
> Only advantage in SQL Express over SQL 2005 Standard edition is it is FREE
> OF COST. SQL Express have below limitations:-
> 1. Maximum 4 GB database size
> 2. Allow only 1 GB RAM
> 3.Allow only 1 CPU
> 4. No Profiler
> 5. No SQL Agent to schedule jobs
> The list goes on and on...
> Thanks
> Hari
>
>
> "Sawlmgsj" <Sawlmgsj@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:948DDF45-3E76-4146-8610-3471873770C1@.microsoft.com...
>
>
Server 2005 Express (compared with Standard edition)?
For example: database size, maximum number of users etc.
What features are not available in the Express edition?
Thanks,
Steve.There is a 4GB limit for database size in SQL Server Express. As far as
number of users I do not think there is any limitation. Here is the complete
feature comparison chart for the different editions:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodin...e-features.mspx
HTH,
Plamen Ratchev
http://www.SQLStudio.com|||Hello,
Only advantage in SQL Express over SQL 2005 Standard edition is it is FREE
OF COST. SQL Express have below limitations:-
1. Maximum 4 GB database size
2. Allow only 1 GB RAM
3.Allow only 1 CPU
4. No Profiler
5. No SQL Agent to schedule jobs
The list goes on and on...
Thanks
Hari
"Sawlmgsj" <Sawlmgsj@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:948DDF45-3E76-4146-8610-3471873770C1@.microsoft.com...
> Is there any information on any limits in the facilities available in SQL
> Server 2005 Express (compared with Standard edition)?
> For example: database size, maximum number of users etc.
> What features are not available in the Express edition?
> Thanks,
> Steve.
>|||Many thanks for your comments and the link to Ms.
Steve.
"Hari Prasad" wrote:
> Hello,
> Only advantage in SQL Express over SQL 2005 Standard edition is it is FREE
> OF COST. SQL Express have below limitations:-
> 1. Maximum 4 GB database size
> 2. Allow only 1 GB RAM
> 3.Allow only 1 CPU
> 4. No Profiler
> 5. No SQL Agent to schedule jobs
> The list goes on and on...
> Thanks
> Hari
>
>
> "Sawlmgsj" <Sawlmgsj@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:948DDF45-3E76-4146-8610-3471873770C1@.microsoft.com...
>
>
Friday, February 24, 2012
Limitations in SQL Server 2005 Express
Is there any information on any limits in the facilities available in SQL
Server 2005 Express (compared with Standard edition)?
For example: database size, maximum number of users etc.
What features are not available in the Express edition?
Thanks,
Steve.
There is a 4GB limit for database size in SQL Server Express. As far as
number of users I do not think there is any limitation. Here is the complete
feature comparison chart for the different editions:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/features/compare-features.mspx
HTH,
Plamen Ratchev
http://www.SQLStudio.com
|||Hello,
Only advantage in SQL Express over SQL 2005 Standard edition is it is FREE
OF COST. SQL Express have below limitations:-
1. Maximum 4 GB database size
2. Allow only 1 GB RAM
3.Allow only 1 CPU
4. No Profiler
5. No SQL Agent to schedule jobs
The list goes on and on...
Thanks
Hari
"Sawlmgsj" <Sawlmgsj@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:948DDF45-3E76-4146-8610-3471873770C1@.microsoft.com...
> Is there any information on any limits in the facilities available in SQL
> Server 2005 Express (compared with Standard edition)?
> For example: database size, maximum number of users etc.
> What features are not available in the Express edition?
> Thanks,
> Steve.
>
|||Many thanks for your comments and the link to Ms.
Steve.
"Hari Prasad" wrote:
> Hello,
> Only advantage in SQL Express over SQL 2005 Standard edition is it is FREE
> OF COST. SQL Express have below limitations:-
> 1. Maximum 4 GB database size
> 2. Allow only 1 GB RAM
> 3.Allow only 1 CPU
> 4. No Profiler
> 5. No SQL Agent to schedule jobs
> The list goes on and on...
> Thanks
> Hari
>
>
> "Sawlmgsj" <Sawlmgsj@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:948DDF45-3E76-4146-8610-3471873770C1@.microsoft.com...
>
>
Server 2005 Express (compared with Standard edition)?
For example: database size, maximum number of users etc.
What features are not available in the Express edition?
Thanks,
Steve.
There is a 4GB limit for database size in SQL Server Express. As far as
number of users I do not think there is any limitation. Here is the complete
feature comparison chart for the different editions:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/features/compare-features.mspx
HTH,
Plamen Ratchev
http://www.SQLStudio.com
|||Hello,
Only advantage in SQL Express over SQL 2005 Standard edition is it is FREE
OF COST. SQL Express have below limitations:-
1. Maximum 4 GB database size
2. Allow only 1 GB RAM
3.Allow only 1 CPU
4. No Profiler
5. No SQL Agent to schedule jobs
The list goes on and on...
Thanks
Hari
"Sawlmgsj" <Sawlmgsj@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:948DDF45-3E76-4146-8610-3471873770C1@.microsoft.com...
> Is there any information on any limits in the facilities available in SQL
> Server 2005 Express (compared with Standard edition)?
> For example: database size, maximum number of users etc.
> What features are not available in the Express edition?
> Thanks,
> Steve.
>
|||Many thanks for your comments and the link to Ms.
Steve.
"Hari Prasad" wrote:
> Hello,
> Only advantage in SQL Express over SQL 2005 Standard edition is it is FREE
> OF COST. SQL Express have below limitations:-
> 1. Maximum 4 GB database size
> 2. Allow only 1 GB RAM
> 3.Allow only 1 CPU
> 4. No Profiler
> 5. No SQL Agent to schedule jobs
> The list goes on and on...
> Thanks
> Hari
>
>
> "Sawlmgsj" <Sawlmgsj@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:948DDF45-3E76-4146-8610-3471873770C1@.microsoft.com...
>
>
limit to the number of rows a dataset can store?
hI,
I am using visual c# 2003 and sqlserver 2000 and i am trying to query a column in the sql server and store it into a dataset but i got an error msg:
The number of rows for this query will output 90283 rows.
------------------------
Query :
SELECT L_ExtendedPrice, COUNT (*) AS Count FROM LINEITEM GROUP BY L_ExtendedPrice ORDER BY Count DESC";
------------------------
Error msg :
An unhandled exception of type 'System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException' occurred in system.data.dll
Additional information: System error.
-------------------------
is there a limit to the number of rows a dataset can store?That's a lot of rows....
Can I ask what you plan to do with them?
And it's not really a sql server question...|||hi,
It is because I am a university student and i am doing my final year project on querying and i need these data to proceed on. I am researching on Small Group Sampling.
I was thinking that i am using sql server 2000 and maybe i can post this question in here as I am really in need of help for this.
thks|||Whatever you thought you wanted to do with the "dataset", why don't you want to do it on the server? All this "C#" and stuff is good, but only when used appropriately. Having a front-end with 90K+ rows is not a good idea, unless it's a report. But if that's the case, - it shouldn't be going into a "dataset."|||Originally posted by sunspot
hi,
It is because I am a university student and i am doing my final year project on querying and i need these data to proceed on. I am researching on Small Group Sampling.
I was thinking that i am using sql server 2000 and maybe i can post this question in here as I am really in need of help for this.
thks
OK, I'll byte...what's your major going to be in....|||Hi,
It is because I need to use the data in thwe dataset to do something else. This question is actually related to a question I posted on :
visual studio.net and sql server 02-12-04 22:01
I do not know what is the wrong things that I have done and that is why I am asking how many rows a dataset can store as I got error msg when I run the program.
I am using visual c# 2003 and sqlserver 2000 and i am trying to query a column in the sql server and store it into a dataset but i got an error msg:
The number of rows for this query will output 90283 rows.
------------------------
Query :
SELECT L_ExtendedPrice, COUNT (*) AS Count FROM LINEITEM GROUP BY L_ExtendedPrice ORDER BY Count DESC";
------------------------
Error msg :
An unhandled exception of type 'System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException' occurred in system.data.dll
Additional information: System error.
-------------------------
is there a limit to the number of rows a dataset can store?That's a lot of rows....
Can I ask what you plan to do with them?
And it's not really a sql server question...|||hi,
It is because I am a university student and i am doing my final year project on querying and i need these data to proceed on. I am researching on Small Group Sampling.
I was thinking that i am using sql server 2000 and maybe i can post this question in here as I am really in need of help for this.
thks|||Whatever you thought you wanted to do with the "dataset", why don't you want to do it on the server? All this "C#" and stuff is good, but only when used appropriately. Having a front-end with 90K+ rows is not a good idea, unless it's a report. But if that's the case, - it shouldn't be going into a "dataset."|||Originally posted by sunspot
hi,
It is because I am a university student and i am doing my final year project on querying and i need these data to proceed on. I am researching on Small Group Sampling.
I was thinking that i am using sql server 2000 and maybe i can post this question in here as I am really in need of help for this.
thks
OK, I'll byte...what's your major going to be in....|||Hi,
It is because I need to use the data in thwe dataset to do something else. This question is actually related to a question I posted on :
visual studio.net and sql server 02-12-04 22:01
I do not know what is the wrong things that I have done and that is why I am asking how many rows a dataset can store as I got error msg when I run the program.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)