Limiting number of database connections per user

Hello,
I would like to find out if it is possible in SQL Server 2000 to limit the
number of concurrent database connections per user. I am new to SQL Server,
and not sure if it is possible to limit it through some sort of parameter.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
DmitriyNo way to limit the number of concurrent database connections PER USER.
Use the user connections option to specify the maximum number of
simultaneous user connections allowed on Microsoft? SQL Server
use SELECT @.@.MAX_CONNECTIONS to determine the maximum number of user
connections that your system allows
see "Setting Configuration Options" in BOL
Aleksandar Grbic
MCDBA, Senior Database Administrator
"Dmitriy" wrote:

> Hello,
> I would like to find out if it is possible in SQL Server 2000 to limit the
> number of concurrent database connections per user. I am new to SQL Server
,
> and not sure if it is possible to limit it through some sort of parameter.
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> Thank you,
> Dmitriy|||Thank you for your quick response.
Spasibo,
Dima
"Aleksandar Grbic" wrote:
> No way to limit the number of concurrent database connections PER USER.
> Use the user connections option to specify the maximum number of
> simultaneous user connections allowed on Microsoft? SQL Server
> use SELECT @.@.MAX_CONNECTIONS to determine the maximum number of user
> connections that your system allows
> see "Setting Configuration Options" in BOL
>
>
> --
> Aleksandar Grbic
> MCDBA, Senior Database Administrator
>
> "Dmitriy" wrote:
>|||Hi
you can use the table "sysprocesses" to get the information abt the
connections to the database , and there by u can restrict each users
programatically
Renjith
"Dmitriy" wrote:

> Hello,
> I would like to find out if it is possible in SQL Server 2000 to limit the
> number of concurrent database connections per user. I am new to SQL Server
,
> and not sure if it is possible to limit it through some sort of parameter.
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> Thank you,
> Dmitriy