Link for 'Compare the Editions'

Hi,
Does anyone have a link for the 'Compare the Editions' Page for SQL 2000? It
appears Microsoft are now only showing the 2005 version page.
Thanks - Ian.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...ar_ts_8dbn.asp
HTH. Ryan
"Ian Samuels" <iasamuels@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eMA%23CvBRGHA.4900@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Does anyone have a link for the 'Compare the Editions' Page for SQL 2000?
> It appears Microsoft are now only showing the 2005 version page.
> Thanks - Ian.
>
|||Hi Ryan,
Thanks but I'm after a comparison of the features - I need to compare SQL
2000 Standard Edition to Workgroup Edition and there was a page similar to
the SQL 2005 page
(http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...-features.mspx) that
seems to have gone.
Thanks.
"Ryan" <Ryan_Waight@.nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ewzZnWCRGHA.6084@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...ar_ts_8dbn.asp
> --
> HTH. Ryan
>
> "Ian Samuels" <iasamuels@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eMA%23CvBRGHA.4900@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>
|||Ian wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:38:59 -0000:

> Hi Ryan,
> Thanks but I'm after a comparison of the features - I need to compare SQL
> 2000 Standard Edition to Workgroup Edition and there was a page similar to
> the SQL 2005 page
> (http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...-features.mspx)
> that seems to have gone.
All I could find in a similar format is this:
http://www.servepath.com/servers/win_sqlserver.htm
I didn't even realise there was a 2000 Workgroup edition.
Dan
|||Daniel wrote to Ian Samuels on Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:51:45 -0000:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Ian wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:38:59 -0000:
Also found this (forgot all about WebArchive!)
http://web.archive.org/web/200503230...s/choosing.asp
It's slow, but it's the last version of the 2000 comparison page that was
put up in March 2005
Dan
|||Ah yeh - great - cheers Dan.
"Daniel Crichton" <msnews@.worldofspack.co.uk> wrote in message
news:uZLPcHERGHA.4900@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Daniel wrote to Ian Samuels on Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:51:45 -0000:
>
> Also found this (forgot all about WebArchive!)
> http://web.archive.org/web/200503230...s/choosing.asp
> It's slow, but it's the last version of the 2000 comparison page that was
> put up in March 2005
> Dan
>

Link for 'Compare the Editions'

Hi,
Does anyone have a link for the 'Compare the Editions' Page for SQL 2000? It
appears Microsoft are now only showing the 2005 version page.
Thanks - Ian.http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/d...br />
8dbn.asp
HTH. Ryan
"Ian Samuels" <iasamuels@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eMA%23CvBRGHA.4900@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Does anyone have a link for the 'Compare the Editions' Page for SQL 2000?
> It appears Microsoft are now only showing the 2005 version page.
> Thanks - Ian.
>|||Hi Ryan,
Thanks but I'm after a comparison of the features - I need to compare SQL
2000 Standard Edition to Workgroup Edition and there was a page similar to
the SQL 2005 page
(http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodin...e-features.mspx) that
seems to have gone.
Thanks.
"Ryan" <Ryan_Waight@.nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ewzZnWCRGHA.6084@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/d... />
s_8dbn.asp
> --
> HTH. Ryan
>
> "Ian Samuels" <iasamuels@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eMA%23CvBRGHA.4900@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>|||Ian wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:38:59 -0000:

> Hi Ryan,
> Thanks but I'm after a comparison of the features - I need to compare SQL
> 2000 Standard Edition to Workgroup Edition and there was a page similar to
> the SQL 2005 page
> (http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodin...e-features.mspx)
> that seems to have gone.
All I could find in a similar format is this:
http://www.servepath.com/servers/win_sqlserver.htm
I didn't even realise there was a 2000 Workgroup edition.
Dan|||Daniel wrote to Ian Samuels on Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:51:45 -0000:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Ian wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:38:59 -0000:
>
Also found this (forgot all about WebArchive!)
http://web.archive.org/web/20050323...es/choosing.asp
It's slow, but it's the last version of the 2000 comparison page that was
put up in March 2005
Dan|||Ah yeh - great - cheers Dan.
"Daniel Crichton" <msnews@.worldofspack.co.uk> wrote in message
news:uZLPcHERGHA.4900@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Daniel wrote to Ian Samuels on Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:51:45 -0000:
>
> Also found this (forgot all about WebArchive!)
> http://web.archive.org/web/20050323...es/choosing.asp
> It's slow, but it's the last version of the 2000 comparison page that was
> put up in March 2005
> Dan
>

Link for 'Compare the Editions'

Hi,
Does anyone have a link for the 'Compare the Editions' Page for SQL 2000? It
appears Microsoft are now only showing the 2005 version page.
Thanks - Ian.http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/architec/8_ar_ts_8dbn.asp
--
HTH. Ryan
"Ian Samuels" <iasamuels@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eMA%23CvBRGHA.4900@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Does anyone have a link for the 'Compare the Editions' Page for SQL 2000?
> It appears Microsoft are now only showing the 2005 version page.
> Thanks - Ian.
>|||Hi Ryan,
Thanks but I'm after a comparison of the features - I need to compare SQL
2000 Standard Edition to Workgroup Edition and there was a page similar to
the SQL 2005 page
(http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/features/compare-features.mspx) that
seems to have gone.
Thanks.
"Ryan" <Ryan_Waight@.nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ewzZnWCRGHA.6084@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/architec/8_ar_ts_8dbn.asp
> --
> HTH. Ryan
>
> "Ian Samuels" <iasamuels@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eMA%23CvBRGHA.4900@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Hi,
>> Does anyone have a link for the 'Compare the Editions' Page for SQL 2000?
>> It appears Microsoft are now only showing the 2005 version page.
>> Thanks - Ian.
>|||Ian wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:38:59 -0000:
> Hi Ryan,
> Thanks but I'm after a comparison of the features - I need to compare SQL
> 2000 Standard Edition to Workgroup Edition and there was a page similar to
> the SQL 2005 page
> (http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/features/compare-features.mspx)
> that seems to have gone.
All I could find in a similar format is this:
http://www.servepath.com/servers/win_sqlserver.htm
I didn't even realise there was a 2000 Workgroup edition.
Dan|||Daniel wrote to Ian Samuels on Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:51:45 -0000:
> Ian wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:38:59 -0000:
>> Hi Ryan,
>> Thanks but I'm after a comparison of the features - I need to compare SQL
>> 2000 Standard Edition to Workgroup Edition and there was a page similar
>> to the SQL 2005 page
>> (http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/features/compare-features.mspx) th
>> at seems to have gone.
Also found this (forgot all about WebArchive!)
http://web.archive.org/web/20050323020459/http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluation/features/choosing.asp
It's slow, but it's the last version of the 2000 comparison page that was
put up in March 2005 :)
Dan|||Ah yeh - great - cheers Dan.
"Daniel Crichton" <msnews@.worldofspack.co.uk> wrote in message
news:uZLPcHERGHA.4900@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Daniel wrote to Ian Samuels on Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:51:45 -0000:
>> Ian wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:38:59 -0000:
>> Hi Ryan,
>> Thanks but I'm after a comparison of the features - I need to compare
>> SQL
>> 2000 Standard Edition to Workgroup Edition and there was a page similar
>> to the SQL 2005 page
>> (http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/features/compare-features.mspx)
>> th
>> at seems to have gone.
> Also found this (forgot all about WebArchive!)
> http://web.archive.org/web/20050323020459/http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluation/features/choosing.asp
> It's slow, but it's the last version of the 2000 comparison page that was
> put up in March 2005 :)
> Dan
>

Line Chart with a "Single Category Group"

Hi Folks
I have a line chart showing some data vs time. The chart is okay when
we have multiple periods (say Q1 2006 and Q2 2006). However, the chart
is empty when only period (the category group) is being displayed.
This leaves me with two questions...,
1. is this because line charts are supposed to show trends over
multiple category groups and thus are Not applicable for a single
category group?
2. is there a fix for this?
Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
Thnx a ton.Oops..., I meant the chart is empty when only a single period (say only
Q1 2006) is selected (i.e. is to be displayed).
> I have a line chart showing some data vs time. The chart is okay when
> we have multiple periods (say Q1 2006 and Q2 2006). However, the chart
> is empty when only period (the category group) is being displayed.|||Allright, the problem has been solved :D
Turns out I need to edit the data field, and enable the "Show Markers"
checkbox :)
Profundus wrote:
> Hi Folks
> I have a line chart showing some data vs time. The chart is okay when
> we have multiple periods (say Q1 2006 and Q2 2006). However, the chart
> is empty when only period (the category group) is being displayed.
> This leaves me with two questions...,
> 1. is this because line charts are supposed to show trends over
> multiple category groups and thus are Not applicable for a single
> category group?
> 2. is there a fix for this?
> Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
> Thnx a ton.

Limiting no of rows in a page

Hi All
We have requirement where a user restrict no of rows which can be displayed
on a page on a report in this report we will be showing invoices for the
check on the top and corresponding check at the bottom. Here a user can set
no of invoices to be displayed on a page. This will always be less or equal
to actual limit which can be displayed.
For example we have 15 invoices but limit set to show on a page is 6 then
report should display only 6 rows in 1st page and another 6 on second page
and remaining on 3rd page.
Can any body let me know how can we restrict no of rows to be displayed on
single page. and also show check at the bottom.
Thanks in advance
Thanks and regds
Rehan Mustafa KhanI have placed several examples of this on www.msbicentral.com Go to
downloads,Reporting Services, RDL
--
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"Rehan Mustafa Khan" <RehanMustafaKhan@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:E46DEAC4-A036-4D6B-9052-C2218B2ED052@.microsoft.com...
> Hi All
> We have requirement where a user restrict no of rows which can be
displayed
> on a page on a report in this report we will be showing invoices for the
> check on the top and corresponding check at the bottom. Here a user can
set
> no of invoices to be displayed on a page. This will always be less or
equal
> to actual limit which can be displayed.
>
> For example we have 15 invoices but limit set to show on a page is 6 then
> report should display only 6 rows in 1st page and another 6 on second page
> and remaining on 3rd page.
>
> Can any body let me know how can we restrict no of rows to be displayed on
> single page. and also show check at the bottom.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Thanks and regds
> Rehan Mustafa Khan
>